|
|
Immigration Rhetoric |
| Wednesday, May 07, 2008 |
Robert White has a good Ethics Daily column entitled "Pondering Immigration." Here are some highlights:
Immigration: everyone has an opinion. We hear rhetoric used to describe the dilemma of undocumented immigrants in this country from politicians to pulpits.
This is an emotionally charged issue. People feel strongly about their opinions. If you don't believe it, just start a conversation with a small group of people concerning this issue.
... The challenge facing faith communities is to address both this issue and the underlying fear that fuels the rhetoric being used today. The language we choose to describe and talk about people is crucial. When a group of people are referred to as "illegal" aliens, are we dehumanizing people? History has taught that attempts to dehumanize people with language usually lead to mistreatment of those same people?
The faith community can begin to deal with this issue by calling us to pay attention to the use of our language. Regardless of our opinions, let us not mistreat others based on our fear and prejudice. The words we use to define and describe others are important. Let us use language of respect and concern even for the undocumented immigrants already here. As our society struggles to find an answer to this issue, let our faith communities practice wisdom and compassion. Amen! As he admits, there are no easy answers, but that should not be an excuse for us to act in an unloving and un-Christlike manner with our language. Hopefully, Christians can set an example with our words and thus bring some civility, rationality, and maybe even progress to the immigration debate. |
posted by Kaylor @ 4:57 PM
  |
|
| 2 Comments: |
-
Didn't White ask a question: "When a group of people are referred to as 'illegal' aliens, are we dehumanizing people?"
While I agree with his follow-up statement that "attempts to dehumanize people with language usually lead to mistreatment of those same people," I would answer his question "No." Referring to a group of people as "illegal" aliens is not an attempt to dehumanize them.
-
I think he was focusing on the "alien" part and not the "illegal" part. I do not think everyone who has used the term does so in a dehumanizing way, but some have.
|
| |
| << Home |
| |
|
|
|
| About Me |
|
Name: Brian Kaylor
About Me: In addition to being an Assistant Professor in Communication Studies (with a focus on political communication), I am also the Editorial Assistant for a Baptist organization where I help lead PR, news and editorial writing, and website work. I have previously served as a pastor of a rural church, received my Ph.D. in communication, and studied at a seminary.
See my complete profile
Email Me
My Website
My Photos
Follow Me on Twitter
|
| Previous Posts |
|
| Archives |
|
|
| Visits & Feeds |
|
|
|
Didn't White ask a question: "When a group of people are referred to as 'illegal' aliens, are we dehumanizing people?"
While I agree with his follow-up statement that "attempts to dehumanize people with language usually lead to mistreatment of those same people," I would answer his question "No." Referring to a group of people as "illegal" aliens is not an attempt to dehumanize them.